Frontegg vs Auth0 | Auth0 Alternatives

Frontegg vs. Auth0

Auth0 by Okta leans heavily on custom development. Frontegg’s low-code capabilities makes it easier for developers to manage complex B2B SaaS identity. Even non-developers can get in on it.

We kick B2B SaaS

Auth0 by Okta doesn't shine for B2B use cases. Their platform requires custom development for RBAC, complex structures, and per-organization settings. User invitations and MFA configuration must be handled via API.

Here at Frontegg, we’re purpose-built for B2B SaaS — and you’ll feel the difference right away. We natively support subscription management, feature flags, and trial management, simplifying the management of B2B user access.

With no APIs needed, it’s easy to replicate your customers’ organizational structures right within the application. For example, customers can set permissions, access levels, and security protocols for different accounts and users at various levels of the hierarchy.

CIAM simplified

Auth0 by Okta is all about custom development. But do engineers really want to spend their time fiddling around with identity management when they could be launching their next cool feature? And do non-technical teams such as InfoSec and product want to have such little control over security issues that impact them?

With Frontegg’s low-code capabilities, non-developers can impact identity management without waiting on the engineering team. Everyone wins.

5 Lines of code to integrate

360° B2B coverage

Low code + pro-code options

Put users in the driver’s seat

Auth0 only supports self-service registration and password reset. Additional self-service features aren’t included out-of-the-box and need to be built out using APIs. Nobody has time for that.

On the other hand, Frontegg’s self-service capabilities keep your end-users moving fast. Our out-of-the-box Admin Portal allows them to view and adjust security settings based on their specific roles and permissions. It’s easy to customize both personal and tenant capabilities such as SSO, user invitations, profile management, and security configurations.

Compare features

Authentication

Both Frontegg and Auth0 offer strong authentication options. If that’s all you need, you’re good either way.

Entitlements

Frontegg offers advanced authorization with context-aware access control -- called Entitlements. Auth0 doesn’t natively support subscription-based entitlements.

B2B capabilities

Frontegg is purpose-built for B2B use cases. Manage organizational hierarchies, user groups, and much more. While Auth0 offers multi-tenancy support, it requires custom coding for RBAC.

Security

Get comprehensive, flexible security features out of the box with Frontegg. Auth0 security settings need to be built out. And they can’t be tuned on a per-tenant basis.

Enterprise readiness

Both Frontegg and Auth0 have key enterprise features such as Hierarchies (Organizations). But Frontegg has certain enterprise capabilities that Auth0 lacks, such as built-in SCIM and audit logs.

Management & analytics

Easily set up and manage users, accounts, and environments. Auth0 is missing certain capabilities here such as environment management.

Self-service

Frontegg’s admin portal allows full self-service. Auth0 has no in-app admin portal -- it needs to be built out using APIs.

Authentication

Both Frontegg and Auth0 offer strong authentication options. If that’s all you need, you’re good either way.

Entitlements

B2B capabilities

Security

Enterprise readiness

Management & analytics

Easily set up and manage users, accounts, and environments. Auth0 is missing certain capabilities here such as environment management.

Self-service

Frontegg’s admin portal allows full self-service. Auth0 has no in-app admin portal -- it needs to be built out using APIs.